Idealization is the intentional introduction of distortion into scientific theories. If science aims at the truth, as scientific realists believe, then why are scientific theories routinely idealized? Roy Sorensen and Michael Weisberg debate that on Philosophy TV.
-
The Bubble Chamber is a blog written by historians and philosophers of science for discussing contemporary issues of science and society through the lens of historical context and critical analysis.
Founded by the University of Toronto's Science Policy Working Group, The Bubble Chamber is a forum for those interested in a critical assessment of science in society and the development, regulation, and trajectory of science.
Pages
Top Posts & Pages
Twitter Updates
- @elouson --- seems like you might have thoughts on @Cmdr_Hadfield 's social media exploits as scientific documentary? 6 days ago
- RT @elouson: New @BblChamber weekly roundup all about @Cmdr_Hadfield and the ISS thebubblechamber.org/2013/05/weekly… 6 days ago
- RT @ByRebeccaBowe: Transcribing my interview w author @davidgraeber. A gem: "The more obviously your work benefits other human beings, the … 3 weeks ago
- RT @elouson: New @BblChamber Weekly Roundup! A doodle, mandatory sci fi, some occasional drinking, and two controversial papers http://t.co… 3 weeks ago
- @Publons @elouson I was thinking about something like this the other day. @ReplyCollective does it well. Worth considering for SponGe... 1 month ago
Recent Comments
- Mayo on "Reply to Wayne Myrvold on the Higgs Boson"
- Greg Lusk on "Snowquester – A perfect storm for HPS/STS"
- Mike Thicke on "Snowquester – A perfect storm for HPS/STS"
- Boaz Miller on "Harry Collins, Expertise, and Elective Modernism"
- Boaz Miller on "Harry Collins, Expertise, and Elective Modernism"
Charged Particles: Blogs We're Tracking
- ActiveHistory
- Age of Engagement
- American Science
- CBC – Technology & Science
- David Suzuki Foundation Blogs
- Double Réfraction
- EconLog
- Ether Wave Propaganda
- Feminist Philosophers
- History & Policy
- It's Only a Theory
- Macleans Magazine
- Nature.com Blogs
- Network in Canadian History & Environment
- New York Times – Science
- Petri Dish
- Philosophy TV
- Public Historian
- Quirks and Quarks
- Real Climate
- Science Progress
- scipolicyeu
- Somatosphere
- The Canadian Science Policy Centre
- The Globe and Mail – Technology
- The Stone
- What's New
- Whewell's Ghost
Cloud Chambers: Tangential Pages
Archives
Meta
Hi, this video about idealization in science is very interesting but I'd like to mention the polish philosopher of science Leszek Nowak (1943-2009). He was the first, in Europe, that developed a systematic conception of idealization in science and his works were written just before Giere's and So...
Hi,
this video about idealization in science is very interesting but I’d like to mention the polish philosopher of science Leszek Nowak (1943-2009). He was the first, in Europe, that developed a systematic conception of idealization in science and his works were written just before Giere’s and Sorensen’s works. So, the question is: why all these scholars never mention Nowak’s work? This is a case of intellectual dishonesty in my opinion. All these scholars, like Giere, Sorensen or even Mauricio Suarez, are discovering idealization in science only nowadays, but Nowak wrote is first paper about idealization at the end of 60′s!!! And during the 70′s he wrote his first works about this topic, comparing his view of science with Popper, Carnap, Hempel, Weber and so on. I wanna give you a piece of advice….Study Leszek Nowak! Anyway, sorry for my english and if you want you can reply also writing a mail to my address.
Good evening to everybody!