Weekly Roundup

One in four Americans believes that the sun revolves around the Earth, according to the results of a NSF survey presented at the recent AAAS meeting. But according to Time magazine, Europeans fared even worse on that question, with one in three responding incorrectly.

Despite an outpouring of protest and offers of rehousing, Copenhagen Zoo killed its “surplus” male giraffe Marius, and then performed a public autopsy with children in the audience. Meat from the corpse was fed to the zoo’s lions. Marius’ death has sparked discussion on the ethics of zoo conservation, with some blaming the zoo’s actions on Denmark’s pragmatic culture.

The health outcomes of people living in food deserts, areas without access to fresh food and which have prompted healthy eating initiatives, aren’t improved by improving access to fresh food; some researchers even believe food deserts aren’t the issue but that the cumulative stress (allostatic load) caused by long-term poverty is responsible for illness. Nutrition is a confusing field with a “dysfunctional research establishment.” All we know without a doubt is that Americans really love pizza.

A report commissioned by The Beer Store, Ontario’s beer retailer, claims that beer would become more expensive if customers could purchase it at convenience stores. But the author of a previous study commissioned by the Ontario Convenience Store Association disagrees.

Bill Nye, The Science Guy debated Ken Ham, young-Earth creationist and head of the Creation Museum, on the question “Is creation a viable model of origins in today’s modern, scientific era?” The entire debate can be viewed on YouTube. While some in the scientific community welcomed the publicity, others claimed that Nye lost by showing up. Post-debate, creationists provided answers to evolutionist issues raised at the debate, while Buzzfeed collected questions from creationists which have been tackled by quite a few bloggers.

Some sciences are just harder than others: a new study in the  Interdisciplinary Journal on Research and Religion claims that social science professors are more religious and politically extreme than their counterparts in the natural sciences, and that the difference is due to the higher intelligence of the natural scientists, thanks to the correlation of both religiosity and political extremism with lower intelligence. [via Marginal Revolution]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *