There Is No Theory of Everything

Simon Critchley at the New York Times relates the life an work of philosopher Frank Cioffi, focusing on his account of the relationship between science and the humanities:

Despite the astonishing breadth of his interests, Frank’s core obsession in teaching turned on the relation between science and the humanities. More particularly, his concern was with the relation between the causal explanations offered by science and the kinds of humanistic description we find, say, in the novels of Dickens or Dostoevsky, or in the sociological writings of Erving Goffman and David Riesman. His quest was to try and clarify the occasions when a scientific explanation was appropriate and when it was not, and we need instead a humanistic remark. His conviction was that our confusions about science and the humanities had wide-ranging and malign societal consequences.

Source: There Is No Theory of Everything – The New York Times.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *