Author Archives: Bubble Chamber

Weekly Roundup

Project SETI for the search of extraterrestrial life is to close down due to financial difficulties. Paul Davies, an astrophysicist at Arizona State University, said “it would be an utter tragedy if a unique research programme is abandoned for the cost of a few miles of motorway … Our society squanders vast sums on trivia and entertainment, yet cannot find some small change to address the burning issue of whether we are alone in the universe,” The Guardian reports.

David Bruggeman discusses whether an alleged “muzzling” of Canadian scientists in the media is an issue for the Canadian elections.

 

Posted in Weekly Roundup | Leave a comment

Roy Sorensen & Michael Weisberg on Idealization in Science

Idealization is the intentional introduction of distortion into scientific theories. If science aims at the truth, as scientific realists believe, then why are scientific theories routinely idealized? Roy Sorensen and Michael Weisberg debate that on Philosophy TV.

Posted in HPS Live | 1 Comment

Weekly Roundup

Leading philosophy journal Synthese has published a mostly critical issue on creationism and intelligent design. The editors in chief added a disclaimer in the printed issue about some of the articles’ allegedly inappropriate tone. This has lead blogger-philosopher Brian Leiter to call for a boycott of Synthese for giving in to creationists’ pressure, and some more criticism and reactions on the blogosphere.

Is contemporary military science fiction a neoliberal simplification of the complex reality of war?

Is science policy an issue in the Canada 2011 election?

Top 40 science questions for U.S. conservation policy makers. Well, almost.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa P. Jackson says that scientific innovation and policy should work together.

Posted in Weekly Roundup | Leave a comment

Science, Policy and the Public

A panel discussion on The Agenda with Steve Paikin on how informed  the electorate, politicians, and the public are on important scientific issues.

Posted in HPS Live | Leave a comment

Weekly Roundup

Scientists solve a problem that has perplexed philosophers for 300 years. And here is a link to the actual paper.

Scientists from the Weiztman Institute of Science storm the Tel Aviv pub scene to tell its party animals about the wonders of science.

A duet from space.

How did language evolve and how much technology design is constrained on BBC’s Science in Action.

Will the Internet collapse the ivory tower?

The Ivory Tower

http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/molyneuxs-question-gets-answered-after-300-years/story-fn5fsgyc-1226037177460S
Posted in Weekly Roundup | Leave a comment

Weekly Roundup

Philip Kitcher

Philip Kitcher has a new article calling for philosophy to expand its concern beyond the traditional core of metaphysics and epistemology. The Leiter Report has an extensive discussion of his paper, including responses from Kitcher.

Eric Schliesser responds to an essay by Robert and Virginia Shiller about the overspecialization of economics. Schliesser responds that economists don’t just need to learn more facts about the world, they need to examine the foundational assumptions of their discipline.

Will climate change affect nuclear security?

Somatosphere has audio recordings of a panel from the Society of Psychological Anthropology on “Political Subjectivity”.

Andy Stirling argues that science can give us no simple answers regarding the choice between nuclear and renewable energy.

Posted in Weekly Roundup | Leave a comment

Weekly Roundup

National Geographic collects photos representative of humanity’s impact on the environment, which is so pervasive that the term “anthropocene” is now being used to describe the current geological epoch.

Public controversy is erupting again over the nearly exclusive use of male mice as a model organism for medical research, especially since they are still used, more often than not, to conduct research into diseases disproportionately affecting women.

NASA’s 30-year-long space shuttle program wraps up this summer. To pre-empt expected upcoming patriotic retrospectives, The Mark’s Jordan Bimm explores the shuttle’s checkered past.

Forbes reports that J. Craig Venter’s team was sued by the estate of James Joyce for encoding “To live, to err, to fall, to triumph, to recreate life out of life” into their synthetic DNA; their inclusion of a Richard Feynman quote, on the other hand, merely earned them a correction from Caltech (via Marginal Revolution).

Errol Morris responds to some of the criticisms of his New York Times “Ashtray” blog.

Chris Mooney at Discover Magazine asks if scientists have “public literacy“.

Judy Sebba asks, What can academic researchers learn from think tanks?

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Clay Shirky on Collective Action in Social Media

Clay Shirky, author of the book Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations (2008) speaking at Harvard Law School’s Austin Hall on the power of social media in facilitating collective action.

Posted in HPS Live | 1 Comment

Weekly Roundup

Amid the hopes and horrors in Libya, a controversy over Saif Gaddafi plagiarizing his PhD from the London School of Economics (apparently supervised by Nancy Cartwright) has been brewing.

Brian Leiter asks whether philosophy departments are being specially targeted for cuts.

Why is the science media so focused on the Fukushima nuclear saga rather than other aspects of Japan’s earthquake?

What’s a bigger threat: nuclear power or coal production?

Michael Ruse compares the New Atheists to the Tea Party.

Students and professors at Imperial College, London will be meeting in April to discuss how to use Wikipedia.

Ashley Brosius at Age of Engagement argues that there needs to be more focus on adaptation to climate change rather than just on prevention.

House Republicans voted against amendments to a bill stating that Congress acknowledges ”basic” facts about climate change.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Weekly Roundup

Simone Lewis-Koskinen, guest blogging for Age of Engagement, reports on a recent AAAS panel on communicating science “outside the box”.

Will Thomas continues his series on “Neglected Connections Between the Histories of Science and Economics“.

Climate scientist Isaac Held has started a new blog explaining his science.

A Texas state senator is promoting a bill that would outlaw workplace discrimination against creationists.

Eugene Raikhel has a fascinating post on a method of treatment for alcoholism in Russia: convincing alcoholics that they have been injected with a drug that will severely harm or even kill them if combined with alcohol.

Posted in Weekly Roundup | Leave a comment