<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Bubble Chamber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebubblechamber.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebubblechamber.org</link>
	<description>Where history and philosophy of science meet society and public policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:47:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What control should the state have over its science? by The Harper Government&#8217;s Science Communication Stinks, But Is it Censorship? &#171; Pasco Phronesis</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2010/10/what-control-should-the-state-have-over-its-science/#comment-3022</link>
		<dc:creator>The Harper Government&#8217;s Science Communication Stinks, But Is it Censorship? &#171; Pasco Phronesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=685#comment-3022</guid>
		<description>[...] I am not trying to defend the Canadian government.  There is plenty to disagree with about their policies of limiting the dissemination of government conducted research results.  But because they allow this research to be published, the problem is one of transparency, and not of censorship. It doesn&#8217;t help those seeking to change the policies to call the bad behavior something it isn&#8217;t.  Utilize Canadian open records and open government laws (whatever might be the equivalent of the Freedom of Information Act) to fight for the information.  Challenge denials and failures to comply with the law. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I am not trying to defend the Canadian government.  There is plenty to disagree with about their policies of limiting the dissemination of government conducted research results.  But because they allow this research to be published, the problem is one of transparency, and not of censorship. It doesn&#8217;t help those seeking to change the policies to call the bad behavior something it isn&#8217;t.  Utilize Canadian open records and open government laws (whatever might be the equivalent of the Freedom of Information Act) to fight for the information.  Challenge denials and failures to comply with the law. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Science and the Media: Upside-Down Pyramid Thinking by enhasiaimmuse</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/01/science-and-the-media-upside-down-pyramid-thinking/#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>enhasiaimmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=1425#comment-3013</guid>
		<description>I like the theme you are using on your blog???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the theme you are using on your blog???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weekly Roundup by enhasiaimmuse</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/04/weekly-roundup-23/#comment-3012</link>
		<dc:creator>enhasiaimmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=2095#comment-3012</guid>
		<description>I may come back later on to check out out your other posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may come back later on to check out out your other posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Academic Boycotts Ever Justified? by enhasiaimmuse</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/03/are-academic-boycotts-ever-justified/#comment-3011</link>
		<dc:creator>enhasiaimmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=2129#comment-3011</guid>
		<description>You can increase your blog visitors by having a fan page on facebook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can increase your blog visitors by having a fan page on facebook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Susan Haack on Scientism and its Discontents by enhasiaimmuse</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/02/susan-haack-on-scientism-and-its-discontents/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>enhasiaimmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=1960#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>Sweet website , super design , really clean and utilize friendly .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet website , super design , really clean and utilize friendly .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is this the era of personalizable medicine? by enhasiaimmuse</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/04/is-this-the-era-of-personalizable-medicine/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>enhasiaimmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=2186#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>This is a impressive story. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a impressive story. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Philosophize About the Business and Bureaucracy of Science by enhasiaimmuse</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2010/11/how-to-philosophize-about-the-business-and-bureaucracy-of-science/#comment-3007</link>
		<dc:creator>enhasiaimmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=1087#comment-3007</guid>
		<description>Don?t confuse fame with success. Madonna is one; Helen Keller is the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don?t confuse fame with success. Madonna is one; Helen Keller is the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roy Sorensen &amp; Michael Weisberg on Idealization in Science by giacomo borbone</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/04/roy-sorensen-michael-weisberg-on-idealization-in-science/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>giacomo borbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=2234#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>Hi,

this video about idealization in science is very interesting but I&#039;d like to mention the polish philosopher of science Leszek Nowak (1943-2009). He was the first, in Europe, that developed a systematic conception of idealization in science and his works were written just before Giere&#039;s and Sorensen&#039;s works. So, the question is: why all these scholars never mention Nowak&#039;s work? This is a case of intellectual dishonesty in my opinion. All these scholars, like Giere, Sorensen or even Mauricio Suarez, are discovering idealization in science only nowadays, but Nowak wrote is first paper about idealization at the end of 60&#039;s!!! And during the 70&#039;s he wrote his first works about this topic, comparing his view of science with Popper, Carnap, Hempel, Weber and so on. I wanna give you a piece of advice....Study Leszek Nowak! Anyway, sorry for my english and if you want you can reply also writing a mail to my address.

Good evening to everybody!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>this video about idealization in science is very interesting but I&#8217;d like to mention the polish philosopher of science Leszek Nowak (1943-2009). He was the first, in Europe, that developed a systematic conception of idealization in science and his works were written just before Giere&#8217;s and Sorensen&#8217;s works. So, the question is: why all these scholars never mention Nowak&#8217;s work? This is a case of intellectual dishonesty in my opinion. All these scholars, like Giere, Sorensen or even Mauricio Suarez, are discovering idealization in science only nowadays, but Nowak wrote is first paper about idealization at the end of 60&#8242;s!!! And during the 70&#8242;s he wrote his first works about this topic, comparing his view of science with Popper, Carnap, Hempel, Weber and so on. I wanna give you a piece of advice&#8230;.Study Leszek Nowak! Anyway, sorry for my english and if you want you can reply also writing a mail to my address.</p>
<p>Good evening to everybody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Philosophize About the Business and Bureaucracy of Science by science project ideas</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2010/11/how-to-philosophize-about-the-business-and-bureaucracy-of-science/#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>science project ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=1087#comment-2995</guid>
		<description>We are a group of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme in our community. Your website offered us with helpful info to work on. You&#039;ve done an impressive task and our entire community can be grateful to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are a group of volunteers and opening a brand new scheme in our community. Your website offered us with helpful info to work on. You&#8217;ve done an impressive task and our entire community can be grateful to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Book Review: The Disappearing Spoon, by Sam Kean by The Weird Story of The Periodic Table &#124; Review Guide Live</title>
		<link>http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/02/book-review-the-disappearing-spoon-by-sam-kean/#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weird Story of The Periodic Table &#124; Review Guide Live</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebubblechamber.org/?p=1930#comment-2992</guid>
		<description>[...] Stop by Allen Cardoza&#039;s site where you can listen to the fascinating interview with Sam Kean. Bestselling author Sam Kean discussed the Periodic Table with L.A. Talk Radio show hosts Allen Cardo...x. The Periodic Table is one of man&#039;s crowning scientific achievements. It is also a story of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stop by Allen Cardoza&#039;s site where you can listen to the fascinating interview with Sam Kean. Bestselling author Sam Kean discussed the Periodic Table with L.A. Talk Radio show hosts Allen Cardo&#8230;x. The Periodic Table is one of man&#039;s crowning scientific achievements. It is also a story of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

